இந்த தீர்ப்பு நாளை அஞ்சல் துறையில் மாற்றத்தை உருவாக்குமா ?
The
Madras High Court Bench here has directed the superiors of a government
servant to refund House Rent Allowance (HRA) deducted from her salary
even though she refused to occupy a dilapidated residential quarters
allotted to her since it was in an uninhabitable condition.
A
Division Bench of Justices V. Ramasubramanian and N. Kirubakaran passed
the order while allowing a 2011 writ appeal filed by S. Radhamani
Thangatchi, then serving as the manager of Government Industrial
Training Institute (ITI) at Pettai in Tirunelveli district since
February 2, 2009.
A
single judge of the High Court had on November 18, 2010 dismissed her
writ petition, for refund of HRA, by citing a 1995 Supreme Court ruling
that a government employee had to either accept the accommodation
offered by the employer or forfeit the HRA if he/she preferred to live
elsewhere.
However,
not in agreement with the view taken by the single judge, the Division
Bench said that a look at the photographs of the house allotted to the
appellant as well as a report of a Public Works Department official
would make it clear that the house was not in a good condition.
“It
is very unfortunate that though the appellant requested the respondents
not to allot the quarters, the second respondent (ITI Principal)
erroneously allotted the quarters in favour of the appellant and
deducted the amount towards rent from the salary of the appellant.
0 comments:
Post a Comment