CASE OF
R.T.P.s AND ADHOC P.A.s
COUNTING
OF TRAINING PERIOD FOR TBOP/BCR/MACPS
Sir,
I
wish to share the following on the counting the period of Induction and
practical training for TBOP/BCR/MACPS in the Department Of Posts. This is in
continuation of my earlier post on this subject.
There
were some queries about the applicability of the training period in the case of
following officials. This is because, as per the salient features for MACPs, the service starts from the date of
regular appointment.
1.
Some officials
undergone training before 1.1.86, worked as RTP for some years before regular
appointment after 1.1.86. Whether the training period would be counted for
TBOP/BCR/MACP in their case.
2.
Some officials
undergone training after 1.1.86, worked for some period as Postal assistants.
For some administrative reasons, they were terminated from the posts. After
some time, they were again posted as Postal assistants. The service rendered as
Postal assistant already was treated as ad-hoc service. Whether the training
period would be counted for TBOP/BCR/MACP in their case.
3.
In some rare
cases, the officials undergone practical training, and after sometime undergone
theoretical training followed by practical training. After having worked as RTP
for some years, they were appointed as regular PA.s. Whether the training
period would be counted for TBOP/BCR/MACP in their case.
In
this connection, kindly refer to Rule 22 of CCS (Pension) Rules 1972 and
Government of India’s Decisions 1, 2 and 3 below Rule 22. For convenience, an
extract of these orders are reproduced below.
GID 1 below Rule 22
Pre-appointment training
period counts as qualifying service
(1)
The staff side of
the National council (JCM) had suggested inter alia that the service rendered
by an employee during the training period before his regular appointment to the
grade may be treated as qualifying service for pension.
(2)
…..training
period may be treated as qualifying service for pension, if the training is
followed immediately by an appointment. This will be admissible to all
Groups C and D employees even if the officers concerned are not given the scale
of pay of the post but only a nominal allowance.
These orders come into force w.e.f.
22.12.1983 and the benefit will be available to all those employees who retired
on or after 22nd December,1983. (para 4 and 5)
GID 2 below Rule 22
Treatment of the
interruption between training and regular appointment.
Reference
decision (1) above, some of the circles, etc have raised doubt about treating
the period of interruption between training period and regular appointment
which is caused due to journey from training place to the posting place or the non-availability
of post etc. The position has
been examined in consultation with the Department of Personnel and
Administrative Reforms and clarified as follows:-
It
is mentioned that the decision (1) above is effective from the date of issue,
i.e. 22.12.1983. Thus, the benefits of this order can be given to an officer
who is in service on that day and retires thereafter.
As
regards treating the interruption period in between training period and regular
appointment, it is stated that the training should be followed immediately by
an appointment which means that there should not be any interruption. Even, if
any interruption falls between the training period and regular appointment,
that should not exceed the joining time admissible under the relevant rules for
the purpose of benefit to be given udder decision (1) above.
Condonation of
administrative delay in issuing posting order after training, for counting
training period for pension.
But instances have come to
notice where there has been administrative delay in giving appointment letters,
etc, after the training period is over and the appointment takes more time than
the joining time admissible under the relevant rules. (para 2)
The
question as to how the intervening period in such type of cases can be treated
if it exceeds the joining time admissible and the delay on the part of the
Government in giving appointment letters and as to whether that intervening
period can be condoned, was referred to Department of Pension and Pensioners’
Welfare who have advised that in cases where the delay is purely
administrative, they have no objection to condoning the said period. (para 3)
From
the above, the following conclusions could be arrived.
1.
The training
period will count for pension, if it is followed by regular appointment without
any break, as per GID 1.
2.
The training
period will count for pension, if there is a break between the period of
training and regular appointment due to delay in joining and also due to
non-availability of posts, if
such period does not exceed joining period, as per GID 2.
3.
The training
period will count for pension, even if the break exceeds the permissible
joining time, the break could be condoned, as per GID 3.
In
the light of the above, for the cases mentioned at the beginning of this
article, the training period counts for pension, and hence for TBOP/BCR/MACPS. These
cases come under the non-availability
of posts mentioned in GID 2 and 3. However, the period between the
training and regular appointment will not count. It may be noted that only the period of training counts
for the above purpose and the period between the training and regular
appointment, viz period of RTP service, break etc. will not count. For the
cases mentioned in 3, a total of 90 days, theoretical and practical training
will count.
This
benefit will be on notional basis from 1.1.86 or date of regular appointment
whichever is later to 30.9.1990. It will be actual basis from 1.10.1990.
Consider
an official who undergone training during 1983. The date of regular appointment is 1.2.1987. In this
case, the official would have earned his first increment on 1.2.88. After
including the training period his first increment would be on 3.11.1987 and
will be drawn on 1.11.1987. His subsequent increments will be on 1st
November. His pay will be regularized accordingly and no arrear will be paid
from 1.2.87 to 30.9.1990. The official is eligible for arrears from 1.10.1990.
The date of TBOP/BCR/MACP should be advanced by 90 days.
For
this purpose, corrigendum is to be issued to the promotion orders viz.
TBOP/BCR/MACPS, by the concerned administrative officers.
I
hope orders for counting the training period for TBOP/BCR/MACPS will be issued
shortly.
Article shared by
R.HARIHARAKRISHNAN,
POSTMASTER,
SRIVAIKUNTAM HO
TAMILNADU CIRCLE 628601
0 comments:
Post a Comment